So: bn = been, 10 = ten, alyyn = all in, fwrs = force, dha = the, rayz = raise, awf = of, hyks = hikes, thmyl = the mile.
However, one plausible intended sentence (if typos included) is: — not fitting. Given common Arabizi usage, the likeliest clean English translation is: "Been the alien force, the raise of hikes the mile" — but "10" = "the"?? Unlikely. 10 = ten. Given ambiguity, I suspect the writer meant:
bn = been 10 = th (for ث ) alyyn = alien (a-l-y-y-n = "alien")? Or “all in”? Try “alien” first. fwrs = force dha = the rayz = raise awf = of hyks = hikes thmyl = the mile bn 10 alyyn fwrs dha rayz awf hyks thmyl
That yields: — ungrammatical.
"10" = ten (literal), not "th".
Step 4 – Meaningful guess Maybe "bn" is not "been" but "بن" (bin = son of) as in Arabic names. Then "bn 10" = "Bin Ten" (sounds like "Bentin" or "Binten"). Then "alyyn" = Allen (name). "fwrs" = force. "dha rayz awf hyks thmyl" = "the raise of hikes the mile" → possibly "the race of hikes the mile".
Original English: — nonsense. Maybe the intended English: "Bent on all in force, the race of hikes the mile" — still poor. So: bn = been, 10 = ten, alyyn
Alternatively, with 10 = th (ث), and "alyyn" = "all in" + "fwrs" = "force" + "dha" = "the" + "rayz" = "raise" + "hyks thmyl" = "hikes the mile" →